About TEC SA
How TEC works
Benefits of TEC
TEC membership
News
Contact us
Home

 
 
News
 
 

Good people –The business success factor

by Randal Godden, Chairman and CEO, at TEC South Africa
This article was first published in Real Business, a supplement to Business Day which appears on the third Monday of every month.

One of the most common catch-phrases in business is the one that says, “People are our most important asset”. But, how many leaders and managers really understand the full import of the statement. In fact, the phrase would be best modified to say, “Good, or the right people are our most important asset”.

In his book “Good to Great”, Jim Collins emphasises the key finding in this regard with respect to great companies. To ensure success, leaders’ biggest responsibility is to select the right, or most appropriate people.

During the selection process, it is far more important to base people decisions on the fundamentals, rather than specific talents. The process should focus on key character traits, work ethic, team orientation, base intelligence, emotional intelligence as well as dedication to results and a clear value system. These are the brass tacks that are more beneficial to success than a person’s specific knowledge, technical background or skills. The latter elements are obviously a factor in certain roles, however.

But, to be successful in this process, as managers we have to be tough and uncompromising in our management of staff. Key factors to take into account include:

Not compromising in the hiring process. Whenever there is any doubt regarding a potential hire, do not proceed regardless of how the doubt arose. It will come back to bite you.

Acting decisively when people changes are required or known – don’t procrastinate. In taking action, however, firstly ensure that the change needs to be implemented to correct a position in the organisation rather than constituting an immediate dismissal.

Considering the Jack Welsh model of 20/70/10. Jack Welsh always evaluated his people across three broad bands:

The 20 % of high performers who were outstanding stars and compensated and rewarded accordingly;

The 70 % of strong, solid performers who were above average in industry terms and the solid rump of any organisation; and

The 10 % of marginal performers who require career re-direction internally or externally.

By following these basic tenets, organisations can build an outstanding team of good people who will ensure success no matter how difficult the environment, industry or economy challenges we all sometimes face.

The ultimate success of this philosophy, or approach, hinges on a management team that will engage in vigorous debate to seek out the best solutions for the required outcomes. Yet, they have to also remain unified behind final decisions without any parochial interests.

In considering this approach, it is however important for the philosophy to be clearly espoused throughout the organisation, and more so at top management level. Consistent behaviour must in fact be applied even more strenuously at this level and be focused on those who have the greatest impact on the results of the organisation. And this applies not just to characteristics, but to decision-making in general, and, particularly, to people decisions.

It is crucial that the same “tough love” philosophy adopted by the leaders is consistently adopted by senior management. The alternative would be a creeping mediocrity that ultimately becomes endemic to the whole organisation.

Accordingly, an organisation’s overall people philosophy has to embrace:
Non-compromising selection of people with the correct character traits.
Providing a challenging and interesting environment to keep them on board long-term.
Providing development opportunities to optimise their performance and skills.
Reward in keeping with their performance.
Ensuring that there is adequate recognition as distinct from reward.
Trying alternatives for a good person who is a “misfit” before de-hiring.
Recognising that if you constantly hire and develop good people that they may move on to bigger and better opportunities – a healthy scenario.

While it may sometimes seem easier to take the quicker approach and settle for a less demanding people specification, the “tough” approach leads to outstanding success in all walks of life – business, governments and sporting teams to mention a few.

Ends

 
   
   
   
   
   
   

 

 
Home | A  A  A | Print page
 
Back to top